// PRODUCT

The number on top is money found, not money spent.

Every screen below is the actual product rendering a synthetic ~$85k/month estate (illustrative — no customer data). The engine attributes every dollar through lineage, then turns what it finds into priced actions, receipts, and one-page reports.

// THE HEADLINE — IDENTIFIED SAVINGS
$258,899/yr
identified savings · 9 open recommendations · 30d window, annualized
10× rule: this number should exceed 10× what you pay for Analytexa — if it doesn't, don't renew.
100.0% of billed usage explained — zero drift
run 20260730T060000 · total $84,318.09
// SPIKES YOU SEE WITHOUT READING NUMBERS

Daily estate cost — one bad day, named

2026-07-21 · lake.events spiked to $889.72 (median $252.81) — culprit: JOB j-1005 2026-07-01 2026-07-30

Anomalies are median/MAD outliers per data product — and every flag names the run that caused it, because attribution is lineage-derived, not workspace-level.

// RECOMMENDED ACTIONS — PRICED, WITH THE FIX

Recommended actions

actionsubjectwindowprojectedconfidenceeffort
unallocated_closure
$10,289.57 unexplained over 30d — closure checklist
platform$10,289.57$125,190/yrestimatedMcopy fix
idle_warehouse
idle $4,500.82 of $9,582.02 warehouse spend (47.0%)
wh-bi-02$4,500.82$54,760/yrstrongScopy fix
failed_run_waste
$1,811.68 spent on runs that produced nothing
j-1009$1,811.68$22,042/yrstrongMcopy fix
duration_regression
runs above 1.5× trailing median since 2026-07-24
j-1013$47.69$580/yrestimatedMcopy fix
low_utilization
avg cpu 12% — downsize candidate (classic compute)
0721-093015…$81.86$996/yrestimatedMcopy fix

Six recommendation types: idle warehouses, failed-run waste, duration regressions, low utilization, spin-up overhead, unallocated closure. Every row carries evidence, projected $/yr, confidence, effort, and a copyable remediation.

Data product P&L — cost × observed consumption

data productprojectedreaders 90dobservation
lake.customer_360$115,047/yr9last read observed 2d ago
lake.events$97,861/yr24last read observed 3d ago
lake.observability$46,566/yr0no reads observed in 90 days
lake.exec_kpis$44,162/yr8last read observed 5d ago

The sensor is honest: coverage shown (here 92.0% of attributed cost has ≥1 observed read), unobservable read paths listed, and the product never says a table is safe to drop — it says "no reads observed" and hands you verify-before-drop steps.

Receipts — measured, not promised

auto-stop lowered $232/day idle $150/day idle the ledger books only engine-measured deltas

found $258,899/yr · realized (measured) $30,077/yr

Every recommendation has a lifecycle — detected → acknowledged → actioned → realized. Realized dollars come only from measured before/after rates across engine runs. Projections never book. That's your renewal case, written by the engine.

// EVERYTHING ELSE YOU GET
printable exec page per data product monthly digest (download, zero egress) budgets + naive forecast per product FOCUS 1.0 export per-SKU discount display unit economics: cost/day, cost/run dashboards & queries economics tag-free owners via run_as open data contract — results are YOUR Delta tables

Roadmap: AI-assisted recommendations via Databricks-hosted model serving — analysis stays inside your workspace, same zero-egress posture.

Request access